Eco-Responsible Packaging

You are currently browsing the archive for the Eco-Responsible Packaging category.

It’s great to have packaging that’s made from renewable resources and that is natural and compostable. But what about the lids or wrappings that are more than often also required with the package? To provide our produce customers with a more integrated solution we’ve had to search around the world for partners that could provide us with the right product.

Vexar is a certified commercially compostable netting brand carried by Conwed which we like because their nets are, of course, compostable, but also breathable, gentle and reusable.  Also, we like the flexible film product called NatureFlexTM made by Innovia Films, a company best known for their Cellophane brand.

The NatueFlex film is great and what’s needed today because it is certified home compostable by the European OK Home Compost standard as well as the ASTM D6400 and the Biodegradable Products Institute (BPI). This is possible because the film is made from cellulose derived from wood pulp, which is harvested from managed plantations.

Innovia makes the film available in heat sealable bags or as wrap format that can be micro or macro perforated for added breathability. The application is quite broad from fresh produce packaging, to bakery items, and to confection and convenience food wrapping to name a few.

» Leave a comment

Tags: , , , , ,

A few weeks ago I was invited to contribute our Earthcycle story to the “Trailblazers for Good” blog on the Care2.com site. It sparked a variety of interesting comments and questions on the palm oil industry which I will address in this and the next few blog posts. Let’s start with the question of where we source our raw fiber material.

More than 70 percent of palm oil is derived from plantations in Malaysia and Indonesia, where the first palm trees were planted in the 1800’s. Earthcycle’s products are made from a waste product of the palm oil industry. Specifically, our packaging material is a moulded pulp product made from the husks where the palm fruit grows.

Before founding Earthcycle Packaging, I lived in South East Asia for 15 years where I became well aware of the destructive tendencies of industrial agriculture and the impact excessive demand was having on the natural world. It is well known that there are some areas that have been desecrated and we do not condone it – as such, we have veered away from doing business (licensing technology, sourcing raw material) from areas of the world that don’t have a mindset toward sustainability or don’t have the wherewithal to invest in RSPO certification.

We chose our suppliers of palm fiber carefully and also became an early member of the Roundtable for Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). The RSPO is a unique organization, bringing together groups that would normally be on opposite sides of the table, to define and certify sustainability in the palm oil industry. Members of the RSPO include social and environmental NGO’s, grassroots organizations and members along the entire supply chain—plantation owners, millers, traders, retailers and financiers. The RSPO agreed on a set of Principles and Criteria for the Production of Sustainable Palm Oil in 2005, launching the certification system in 2007.

It was important to me to get a third party review done on our Malaysian plantation partners so we commissioned SGS Qualipalm, an authorized auditor for the RSPO to assess our source of palm fiber against the RSPO defined guidelines for land title, High Conservation Value (HCV) areas and agrochemical use.

Based on the SGS Qualipalm report, we can safely say that our partner plantation first planted palm trees in 1976, and has existing legal documentation for land titles and proof of occupation and use. The location is in an area of Peninsular Malaysia where there are no significant High Conservation Value (HCV) forests or wildlife habitats. No orang-utans were lost in development of the plantation since Peninsular Malaysia has not recorded sittings of orang-utans. Sittings of species protected under Malaysian law on the plantation include monitor lizards, barn owls and forest cats. Also, the assessment confirmed that there has been no conversion of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) to oil palm as per Malaysia’s National Plan. Issues of HCVF are minimal since current activities do not involve clearing of natural areas.

The quest for sustainability is a journey—if we were all perfect, there would be no need for the certification in the first place. So, it is expected that there are areas in the plantation management that need improvement as measured against the RSPO Principles and Criteria.

There is still much work to be done and I’m committed to working with our current and any future partners to help them improve best practices in their operations.

» Leave a comment

Tags:

Just like regular plastic, oxo-degradable plastic is made from oil or natural gas by-products, and according to the Oxo-Biodegradable Plastics Association (OBPA), degradation is possible by adding a chemical substance that decreases the material’s molecular weight over a given time period.

This additive process helps to speed up oxidation of the plastic, which then breaks down as long as the necessary elements of oxygen and microorganisms are available, such as air, soil, landfill, compost, and litter (Ecosafeplastics.com).

Proponents of oxo-degradable plastics claim various science-backed advantages, such as recycling safe and food safe, and also state that the oxo-plastics will biodegrade. However, this is where the debate gets a bit blurry because there is as of yet no one standard for the exact definition of “biodegradability.” According to a recent article from the European Plastics News, the ISO 17088 for example “requires that total biodegradation must be achieved within six months.” For oxo-degradable plastics biodegradation can be a whole lot longer – beyond twelve months.

Also, the Biodegradable Products Institute (BPI) says they have not yet seen any science backed “biodegradable” plastics that will break down completely in landfills within twelve months and leave no residue as per consumers’ expectations.

According to the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Green Guide, a product or package qualifies as biodegradable if it “completely breaks down and returns to nature, decomposing into elements found in nature within a reasonably short period of time after customary disposal.”

Oxo-degradable plastics will leave residues behind in the environment after degradation. Even though these microscopic pellets are not toxic and will not emit methane or nitrous oxide (OBPA 2010), they still remain in the environment and thus, the “biodegradability” argument continues.  

One major argument for oxo-degradable plastic is that as long as oil and gas extraction continues for energy consumption, it makes sense to use the associated by-product. Some sources question the use of limited land and water resources for example to produce bio-plastics such as PLA (corn plastic) which requires special industrial composting at 140 degrees. On the other hand, our dependence on non-renewable resources has to shift sooner rather than later so we would be wise to incorporate the available alternatives and help to optimize them.

In addition to the increasing use of PLA, there are agricultural fiber based products available on the market that are made from renewable resources, such as palm, bamboo, bulrush, and bagasse. These products are 100 percent compostable in the backyard compost and once broken down, make a healthy contribution to the soil as humus.

There are concerns that the majority of consumers will still toss compostable plastic packaging into their regular recycling or waste collection bins, especially since the infrastructure for curb side pickup of compost is not yet readily available in many municipalities. However, consumer awareness and responsibility is on the rise and an increasing number of individuals compost and sort their recyclables.

Statistics Canada says that in 2006, 30% of Canadians did compost their kitchen waste through a curb side program. In addition, many municipalities are starting to add compost to their curb-side pickup. Vancouver, my hometown, for example, has just announced their commitment to start a curb side compost program on Earth Day, April 22, 2010. Stay tuned to this blog for a discussion on Vancouver’s new composting initiative.

More links of interest:

Oxo-biodegradable Plastics Association

Symphony Environmental

Ecosafe

The Packer: Debate arises on sustainable packaging

PlasticsNews.com: Bioplastics industry joins oxo-degradable debate

Edie.net: ‘Degradable’ plastic not so environmentally fantastic, study reveals

Biodegradable polymers market to grow at 13% through 2014

The Truth About Bioplastics

» Leave a comment

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Polystyrene is one of the most widely used petroleum-based plastic products. We pretty much find it everywhere from insulation material for buildings to rescue equipment to packaging (yes, the “peanuts”) to plastic cutlery, coffee cups, and sandwich boxes.
It is synonymous with Styrofoam which is simply the trademark name owned by Dow Chemical Company. It’s easy to see the popularity of polystyrene given its strength, flexibility, lightweight, floatability, dye capacity, and insulation properties, among others. And yes, it is huge for meeting health safety standards and transportation needs. It is hard to imagine how we coped before the 1983 invention came along.

 

However, there are some major drawbacks. Polystyrene, or plastic No. 6 (PS), will not biodegrade, and according to Earth911.com, “Polystyrene is not easily recycled because it’s lightweight, has a low scrap value, and is not generally accepted as part of curbside recycling programs.” A recent article on styrofoam from the Centre for Civic Governance even suggested scrap value of polystyrene in the U.S. is negative.

While the polystyrene industry has been taking significant steps to advance the recycling of polystyrene, in looking at long-term market trends, the American Chemistry Council sees continuing challenges. When it comes to food services polystyrene in particular, they say that recycling efforts are not significant because the infrastructure required to do so is simply not sustainable in many markets.

So where does it go?  Due to polystyrene’s super light weight, it is unsinkable and easily carried by wind and water, thereby causing a large percentage to end up in places other than landfills.

A recent post on the official EPA blog Greenversation noted that “Polystyrene creates waste that just does not go away.” In particular, we see it floating around in our waterways and oceans providing danger to animals. In the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, “There are almost three kilograms of plastic for every half-kilo of plankton, which has a devastating effect on aquatic life that confuse the two” (Civic Governance, 2009). And now, scientists have just discovered another garbage patch in the Atlantic.

In addition, according to the EPA, the production of polystyrene releases 57 chemical byproducts, many of which can cause serious health challenges.

There are many alternatives to polystyrene on the market today, in particular in the packaging world. Click here for a recent post on some of these alternatives.

Here are a couple more interesting links:

Earth Resource Foundation Polystyrene Report

Great Pacific Garbage Patch Video

YouTube Preview Image

» Leave a comment

Tags: , , , ,

Bioplastics  are a form of plastic that come from renewable sources, such as corn, vegetable oil or corn starch, for example. They differ from the standard plastics, made from petroleum, that we have come to depend on in society over the past several decades. For example, many clear plastic containers today are made from PLA or polylactic acid – a resin produced from corn. NatureWorks  in the USA is the world’s largest producer of PLA. Their containers are compostable in industrial composting facilities only. PLA is also used in cups and containers as an impermeable liner.

Scanning the Internet, there has been quite the debate over the past few years on whether or not corn plastic actually makes us better off than our conventional petroleum based PET. So here is a condensed list derived from the more prominent sources* that summarizes some of the key advantages and disadvantages of corn plastic:

Advantages of PLA

  1. Derived from corn which is a renewable resource
  2. PLA products are compostable in industrial composting facilities
  3. PLA is cost competitive with regular petroleum-based resins such as PET and most likely cost advantaged in the future given rising petroleum prices
  4. Producing PLA uses 65% less energy than producing conventional plastics
  5. Producing PLA creates 68% fewer greenhouse gases than producing conventional plastics
  6. PLA contains no toxins
  7. From a safety perspective it will not blow up like oil might

PLA pellets

Drawbacks/Criticism of PLA
  1. PLA is only compostable in industrial composting facilities – access is limited as only few sites in the USA exist (113+)
  2. PLA in large amounts may interfere with conventional composting because the resulting polymer will make the compost wetter and more acidic
  3. Consumers will dump PLA in with their regular PET recycling which can contaminate the PET recycling stream if it happens in large quantities
  4. Material Recovery Facilities (MRFs) have to pay to sort out PLA and pay again to dispose of it
  5. Because of the lack of infrastructure, the majority of PLA packaging is likely to still end up in landfills
  6. Most of the corn used to produce PLA is genetically modified
  7. Some individuals raise morality concerns in using food for packaging if so many people in the world are starving

In addition to PLA, there are a number of other renewable packaging alternatives hitting the markets, most notably, agricultural fiber products produced using natural fibers such as bagasse, bamboo, bulrush, and palm fiber. They differ mainly in that they can be composted at home, not requiring an industrial composting facility.  While they have many advantages, agricultural fiber based products are not necessarily direct substitutes to PLA. For example, they cannot be used for high moisture applications, such as cups, without partnering with PLA or other such product to offer a barrier coating.   

 *Sources
The Daily Green – TheDailyGreen.com: Is Corn Plastic Good for the Environment?
Smithsonian Magazine – Smithsonian.com: Corn Plastic to the Rescue
Nature Works LLC – NatureWorksLLC.com: Fact or Fiction
Oregon Environmental News – OregonLive.com: Corn plastic sounds great, but it’s tough to recycle and may foul systems
Plastic Redesign Project

» Leave a comment

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

An increasing number of products today are described as “eco-friendly” and biodegradable. However, not all of them live up to the environmentally friendly label. Even those that do make the grade as certified biodegradable or compostable don’t end up where they should.

According to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), “Organic materials—comprised of yard trimmings, food scraps, wood waste, and paper and paperboard products —are the largest component of our trash and make up more than two-thirds of the US 249.6 million tons of solid waste in 2008.” The product category of containers and packaging specifically is right up there with 31 percent or 78 million tons making it to the municipal waste stream.

So what can we do? To start, let’s sort through the confusion and break down (pun intended) the differences between products that are compostable and those that are biodegradable.

Biodegradable

According to the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Green Guide, a product or package qualifies as biodegradable if it “completely breaks down and returns to nature, decomposing into elements found in nature within a reasonably short period of time after customary disposal.”

The Biodegradable Products Institute (BPI) cites a 2006 American Chemistry Council study showing that most consumers believe a product labeled “biodegradable” will go away completely and on its own in a year or less. The BPI says many consumers also believe that these products will “biodegrade” in landfills.

However, most of today’s landfills lack the key ingredients of exposure to sunlight, air and moisture for the product or package to break down in a timely manner. The BPI notes that today’s landfills are engineered to eliminate moisture and to slow biodegradation. “In fact, researchers have found in landfills legible 30 year old newspapers; 5 year old lettuce and 10 year old hotdogs,” the BPI said in a recent article. They strongly encourage that we focus our energy on our solid waste challenge through more source reduction, reuse, recycling and composting, decreasing the amounts of waste going to landfills and incinerators.

To combat the hikes in “biodegradable” claims, the FTC has been cracking down on false or deceptive environmental marketing claims.

Compostable

View of Earthcycle Packaging decomposing in your compost bin

Compostable products are similar to biodegradable ones, but when they break down, they turn into humus, which provides valuable nutrients to the soil. According to the FTC, for products to qualify as certified compostable “all the materials in the product or package will break down into, or otherwise become part of, usable compost (e.g., soil-conditioning material, mulch) in a safe and timely manner in an appropriate composting program or facility, or in a home compost pile or device. Compostable products typically break down over one to four months in a composter, depending on the product size and material used.

The important distinction between biodegradable and compostable products is that the resulting humus is safe and a valuable nutrient to soil.  The humus is tested for heavy metal content and must meet US and Canadian stated levels in order to be considered compostable.

Earthcycle turns to humus in your compost

So, while some products are considered biodegradable, they may not be considered compostable because they either don’t meet the heavy metal requirements or don’t break down in a timely fashion.

In the alternative packaging world, certified compostable products, such as our Earthcycle packaging, are made out of such natural products as palm fiber (which Earthcycle uses), bagasse (a sugarcane fiber), and vegetable starch to name a few. If you’re curious how Earthcycle composting works and what our product Life Cycle looks like – click here.

So, in addition to making better purchase decisions, looking for certified compostable products etc. (look for label below), and composting as much as applicable material as possible, here’s what the EPA recommends we can do:

“Reducing, reusing, recycling, and rebuying—the four “Rs”—is key to diverting organic materials from landfills or incinerators and protecting human health and our land, air, and water. Waste reduction and recycling prevents greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions, reduces pollutants, saves energy, conserves resources, and reduces the need for new disposal facilities.”

BPI Compostable Logo

» Leave a comment

Tags: , , , ,

Earthcycle is a leader among several companies working to make eco-responsible packaging the first choice for retailers, packers and consumers. We believe the more you know about the various eco-packaging alternatives, the easier it will be for you to make the right choices at the checkout.

There are various types of eco-packaging out there today, from bioplastics to various types of agricultural fiber, such as our palm products and others made of bamboo, bulrush and bagasse, to name a few. Each packaging alternative that can decompose into compost after use, instead of being added to the landfill, has a place in helping rid our planet of greenhouse gases, and contribute to a more sustainable society.

Let’s start by looking at bioplastics,which can now be found in everything from shopping bags to fast-food utensils to beverage containers.

PLA pellets

Bioplastics are a form of plastic that come

from renewable sources, such as corn, vegetable oil or corn starch, for example. They differ from the standard plastics, made from petroleum, that we have come to depend on in society over the past several decades.

For example, many clear plastic containers today are made from PLA or polylactic acid – a resin produced from corn. The containers are compostable but only in industrial composting facilities. PLA is also used in cups and containers as an impermeable liner. Stay tuned to this blog for a discussion of the pros and cons of PLA.

Many companies are moving away from standard plastics or, at the very least, using less petroleum-based material in their products. For instance, Coca-Cola, is piloting the PlantBottle , a new eco-friendlier container made in part from sugar cane and molasses. Coke says up to 30 percent of PlantBottle is made from plant-based material. It says PlantBottle is recyclable, has a lower reliance on a non-renewable resource, and reduces carbon emissions, compared with its standard petroleum-based PET plastic bottles. It’s a start.

Running shoe maker Mizuno has started to make some of its shoes using castor oil, a renewable resource, in its thermoplastic elastomers (which is a mix of plastic and a rubber).

More companies are also working to reduce the world’s dependence on polystyrene, sometimes known as Styrofoam (a trademark of Dow Chemical Co.), which is used in disposable coffee cups and cushioning material for packaging electronics and other goods. Rarely is polystyrene recycled due to the cost nor does it biodegrade—it just goes straight to landfill.

Some cities in the U.S. and around the world have banned polystyrene packaging in favour of earth-friendly containers that use fibers from materials such as wood, palm, bamboo, bulrush and bagasse.

Bulrush, for example, is an organic, sustainable, 100% compostable material that comes from the bulrush plant. Bulrush is grown in marshy areas normally considered unfit for growing crops. Similar to palm fiber, it is harvested and used by packaging companies to make a variety of food containers and other products.

Bagasse, the byproduct of sugarcane, is another fibrous material used in eco-packaging. When sugar cane is crushed to extract its juice, the leftover is bagasse.

Raw palm fiber

Earthcycle packaging is made of palm fiber sourced in Malaysia. A big advantage of our products over other eco-packaging is our ethical sourcing policy . So while our fiber is renewable, natural and non-GM, making for fully home compostable packaging, we can also assure that Earthcycle’s sources of raw material have not replaced any primary forest nor converted any Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA) for the purpose of palm oil production.

The above mentioned are just some of the eco-packaging alternatives that can be used to replace the “traditional” plastic packaging that society has come to heavily depend on.

Increasingly, more options are available for consumers today. Next time you buy something – whether it’s a box of strawberries or a big-screen TV – check the packaging. Where possible, pick the product that has the sustainable alternative or ask your retailers to make a change. It’s worth it!

» Leave a comment

At Earthcycle we source palm fiber from Malaysia, the largest exporter of palm oil in the world. According to the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank, Malaysia is also the world’s second largest palm oil producer, behind Indonesia.

Malaysia’s palm oil industry began in the early 1900s and grew rapidly in early 1960s as part of a government agricultural diversification program. According to the Malaysian Palm Oil Council (MPOC) , about five million hectares of land in Malaysia is under oil palm cultivation today, producing about 17 million tonnes of palm oil.

For years, after the harvest of palm fruit for oil, the leftover palm fiber was mostly incinerated or dumped in landfill, causing many negative environmental impacts. As part of the effort to move the Malaysian palm oil industry towards sustainability, a more productive use was discovered for this waste – packaging.

Earthcycle has developed an innovative way to turn this former waste into environmentally responsible packaging alternatives such as produce packaging, food trays and other applications.

The raw fiber used in the production of Earthcycle packaging is sourced from palm plantations in west Malaysia that have been reviewed against principles and criteria established by the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) – an organization which defines and certifies sustainability in the palm oil industry. Heap of palm fiber

We also provide earth-to-earth packaging solutions. That means our product comes from the earth, and after displaying and protecting products, returns to the earth through composting. Earthcycle packaging is also certified compostable. That means it has been officially recognized as a product that will break down in a backyard compost. It turns into humus which can then be added as a healthy contribution back into the earth. What’s more, the palm fiber we source is ethically sourced and is not genetically modified.

For more on the palm oil industry, check out these links:

Potential of Palm Oil for Developing Countries and Role in the Food and Fuel Debate

Malaysian Palm Oil Council

» Leave a comment

Tags: , , , ,